[ad_1]
Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin’s weblog submit highlighting the threats he sees that synthetic intelligence (AI) may pose to humanity has attracted a slew of fiery responses from AI and blockchain neighborhood members.
On Nov. 27, Buterin revealed a weblog submit titled “My techno-optimism,” which mentioned how AI is “basically totally different” from different innovations like weapons, airplanes and social media. Moreover, Buterin defined that it may develop a brand new type of “thoughts,” which may work in opposition to people and turn out to be the brand new apex species.
The weblog submit attracted discussions on varied fronts and sparked totally different sentiments on X (previously Twitter). Some voiced their settlement with the Ethereum founder, whereas others shared their criticisms of the submit.
An X account known as Emergent Perspective, which focuses on occasions within the web age, replied that they agree with Buterin’s ideas on the weblog submit. Based on the X person, individuals who argue that optimistic intentions can assure that AI “can do no hurt” scare them. “That has been true of completely nothing in human historical past, and this is not going to be the primary exception,” they added.
I am with @VitalikButerin on this one.
The one folks whose opinions on #AI scare me are the individuals who argue that “Constructive Intentions = assure that AI can do no hurt.”
That has been true of completely nothing in human historical past, and this is not going to be the primary exception. https://t.co/BVGwPjIbMg
— Emergent Perspective (@_emergent_) November 27, 2023
One other X person voiced different worries about AI. A neighborhood member who goes as “Wei Dai” on X mentioned that considered one of their issues is that AI might inherently disfavor protection, decentralization and democracy. Based on Dai, AI may speed up the “improper mental fields,” and people pushing in opposition to it might not be sufficient.
Associated: How decentralization can mitigate ‘dystopic’ synthetic intelligence dangers — SingularityNET exec
Not everybody agreed with Buterin’s sentiment. One other neighborhood member criticized Buterin and claimed that know-how specialists like Buterin “appear to have an entire disregard or immature view” of human psychology. The neighborhood member argued that the motivation behind constructing “morally poor” human experiences is all the time cash. The X person urged the neighborhood to know each issues and other people and never only one or the opposite.
the issue with Vitalik’s submit imo:
he has a predefined concept of ‘humanitarian values’
however i dont suppose these are a priori
i imagine the values come after and with the techcfr horse-carriage riders when the motorcar made its intro
usually i believe he is a gud man tho https://t.co/6ZWjWT9fdZ
— 0xBlixa (@0xBlixa) November 28, 2023
In the meantime, a neighborhood member additionally argued on X that one of many issues with the weblog submit is Buterin’s predefined concept of humanitarian values. The neighborhood member defined that these shouldn’t be predefined and should come after and with the know-how.
Whereas many expressed their settlement and disagreements, others merely sat on the fence, saying they stay up for participating in humanity’s collective effort to seek out the solutions.
Journal: Actual AI use circumstances in crypto, No. 1: One of the best cash for AI is crypto
[ad_2]
Source link